skip to Main Content

Europe eyes stricter rules on facial recognition


Europe’s privacy watchdogs are looking to tighten restrictions on the use of facial recognition in a shift that could limit how governments and large companies use the technology.

Police and security forces across the EU increasingly resort to facial recognition to scan crowds for threats, with use cases popping up in BerlinCopenhagen and on the streets of U.K. cities.

Tech companies are also big users, as Facebook automatically scans profiles to match photographs against users who have provided consent and Apple uses face-scanning to unlock phones.

But as the technology becomes more widespread, it’s also growing more controversial. Amid reports of unbridled public surveillance in China, data protection activists around Europe argue that scanning faces without explicit consent amounts to a violation of the bloc’s sweeping privacy law, the General Data Protection Regulation.

Now a group of European privacy watchdogs is set to lend them support. According to representatives from two national authorities who spoke to POLITICO on the condition of anonymity, watchdogs discussed new guidelines on Tuesday at a joint meeting in Brussels that would effectively tighten restrictions around the use of facial recognition technology.

In particular, the watchdogs are looking to reclassify facial recognition data as “biometric data,” which under the GDPR is considered “sensitive data” and requires explicit consent from the person whose data is being collected as well as other stricter privacy protections. Without these, collection of the data is forbidden.

The draft change, which coincides with a warning about police use of face-scanning by U.K. privacy watchdog Elizabeth Denham, has a potentially far-reaching impact for governments and private corporations, namely Silicon Valley companies that are subject to the GDPR when they collect data on Europeans.

If national data protection authorities endorse the draft guidelines and start to police facial recognition more closely, use of the technology could be severely curtailed. Current methods to alert the public that they are under video surveillance, typically the display of a prominent sign, would not rise to the standard of “explicit consent” required for collecting biometric data.

Continua a leggere su POLITICO.

Crediti immagine: David McNew/AFP

Back To Top